LOGIC... AND PHYSICS

99% of all of you, 99% of the time (and I'm probably being very optimistic, I could have written 99.99%), the moment a newspaper, an "expert", a professor explains some phenomenon to you, you lose any recourse to logic and any recourse to physics, which also explains logic.

Just two days ago I posted an article, again from "La Repubblica (of bananas)", where Stopman (it's amazing how they put these clowns in to represent the void and even give them stage names — the premeditation is incredible) and Musk said we should stop AI in certain fields.

Despite the alarm raised by Ferrazza (the fool who writes this article for La Repubblica), logic says otherwise.

Logic dictates that, if they don't stop it, they have an interest in not stopping it.

Physics dictates that, if it doesn't stop, the force that lets AI carry on undisturbed along its (cannibalization) path is stronger than the force needed to stop it.

Words apply no force unless they're followed by facts, which, yes, do help increase the forces in play (or decrease them).

Logic dictates that, when they locked us in our homes, someone had an interest in locking you in your homes.

Physics dictates that, when they locked us in our homes, the force applied by whoever wanted us locked in was greater than the force applied by all of us wanting to get out.

That many attack Netanyahu for his attacks on Gaza means nothing. If Netanyahu keeps doing whatever he wants, it's because the force applied by him and by those behind him is greater than the force of those who wouldn't allow all this.

All of this is just stating the obvious.

But these are truths that aren't obvious the moment someone tries to justify incredible things that instead find, in plain logic and in physics, more than sufficient justification.