GIORGETTI’S REGRET AND DOUBLE-ENTRY BOOKKEEPING
By Mauro Marturano
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO LOAD OURSELVES WITH DEBT
The liquidation of credit, absolutely necessary to solve the problem of the multiplication of loaves and fishes, implies, among other things, that we must get ourselves into as much debt as possible for things that are absolutely unnecessary.
Why?
Simple.
If the objective is — and you can safely remove the “if” — to take monetary claims away from the average citizen, claims that would give him the possibility of converting them into real claims (which do not exist, and it is a certainty that they cannot exist), then it is logical to think that, if we performed a simple double-entry bookkeeping exercise — credits on the left, debts on the right — increasing the amount of debt would reduce the difference.
In other words, the average citizen would have fewer net monetary claims.
And those claims — the left-hand side — are themselves affected and, specifically, reduced by the rising cost of living and the rising price of real assets.
It costs more to buy groceries.
It costs more to buy a house.
It costs more to buy gold.
It costs more to buy bitcoin.
It costs more to buy a boat.
It costs more to buy, in general, anything that can represent a form of wealth preservation.
It is therefore clear that the left-hand side of this imaginary balance sheet sees real purchasing power decline while debt increases.
Increase in every conceivable way.
Above all in the part of the world where the left-hand side was larger.
And where was the left-hand side larger?
Where? 😂
Where? 😂😂😂
Is it necessary to screw over the African middle class?
Does the average African even have enough claims to constitute the problem?
And therefore, is it clear why climate change is a European problem?
Is it clear why the issue of climate change does not exist in Africa?
It does not exist because the climate-change issue is purely an economic and monetary issue — a matter of economic and monetary destruction.
It is a false ideology used to justify a real theft.
And then it becomes clear why a war was supposedly organized whose only continent to be destroyed economically is Europe.
Do you understand what rearmament is for?
Does it not, after all, entail an increase in debt — the right-hand side — and a decrease in claims — the left-hand side — as a result of higher energy costs in the past and higher energy and grain costs following Zaporizhzhia (or something similar)?
Do you understand why the bitch paid ten times as much for vaccines as the other, equally backward, countries?
Do you understand why Italy introduced an absurd measure such as the 110% Superbonus?
Do you understand that all the macro-decisions made by all our fucking countries have the consequences described above?
We absolutely must put an end to the great illusion of the average citizen — who has accumulated ever greater expectations.
And the average citizen with the greatest expectations is the average European citizen.
A citizen who lived through an era of extraordinarily generous welfare, utterly inconsistent with the continent’s underlying demographic, productive and energy dynamics.
In Calabria, they would say that they fattened us up.
The longer this global pantomime continues — on every front — the more serious the underlying monetary problem must have been.
You need to understand this point.
It explains the past, the present and the future.