MANY PEOPLE ARE HAPPY ABOUT THE “END” OF GLOBALIZATION
By Mauro Marturano
And that is why they are happy about Trump’s measures, which obviously move in the direction of a deglobalized world.
As always, for me, understanding is an obligation.
And understanding also means asking why someone WANTS a certain phenomenon to happen at a particular moment and, for example, why that same person did not want that same phenomenon to happen — or to end — at some point in the more or less recent past.
To understand all of this, I think we first need to understand what globalization was actually used for.
Globalization was the means of controlling the entire world, all the people in the world, and all the trade in the world.
Globalization made it possible to exploit all resources — resources in the form of raw materials and resources in the form of labor.
It also made it possible to exploit all these resources at minimal cost, especially for the benefit of one part of the world: ours.
Globalization was lubricated with money created out of thin air.
Whenever the numbers did not add up, the numbers were made to add up through the money printer.
Ultimately, globalization made it possible to control the world and everyone in it.
If you do not understand these concepts, there is no point in reading any further.
Go back up, read it again, and then read it again. 😂
And why would anyone want to destroy such an apparently perfect little game?
Because in one part of the world — ours, the part in which the resources produced elsewhere were exploited — those who controlled the money printer deliberately abused it.
The moment you SQUIRT OUT paper, you squirt out rights as well — in other words, you make people believe that they possess enormous economic and other rights.
Because having money means having rights.
The money printer began operating at a crazy pace, far faster than the physical exploitation of the people in the places where the products were actually being made.
Far faster than the pace at which products could actually be transformed, processed, and transported.
In other words, an enormous temporal mismatch was created between the speed at which rights were created on paper and the speed at which those rights could actually become available in reality.
Here is an easy example.
Imagine that we are on an island and millions of banknotes start falling from the sky.
We all start picking them up...
But what value do they have if everyone is busy collecting banknotes and nobody is concerned with giving those banknotes any value?
In other words: producing goods that can actually be exchanged for those banknotes?
Only in light of these considerations can we begin to reason about the “end” of globalization.
Who benefits from the end of globalization?
Certainly those who printed all that money.
Because if it is true that globalization was a method of controlling the ignorant masses — no one excluded — then, if they now want to deglobalize the world, the only reason for doing so is that this method of controlling the world no longer works.
And therefore, once again, we are passive subjects in the creation and implementation of a new world.
And let me be clear: Mr. Trump is also a passive subject.
He would have become an active subject if he had told the world what is written in this text.
Namely, that globalization was the technical instrument for a large-scale fraud, on a BIBLICAL scale.