I THINK WE OFTEN USE WORDS THAT ARE, AT THE VERY LEAST, INAPPROPRIATE
By Mauro Marturano
“Zionists,” “pedophiles,” “Khazars”... derogatory terms.
When people use these words, I think they start from a completely wrong assumption: that we are people capable of being sovereign.
Or, in the mirror-image version, that we are not a flock.
Let’s say that, if we needed proof of all this, the proof came six years ago.
And almost all of us answered: “Yes, we are sheep.”
So... can we really look at them in such a derogatory way if, in fact, we are simply sheep belonging to a flock that is ABSOLUTELY incapable of managing itself?
Leaving aside the master proof which, once again, we already have, there are actually countless other situations demonstrating how extraordinarily efficient and effective they are at managing the masses: international trade, the ability to provide mobility for millions of people, the ability to manage billions of people.
If there is anyone who cannot complain, it is precisely the citizens of our part of the world.
Let me give you a concrete example to make this easier to understand:
An Italian municipal or government employee — or an employee of a private company — aged 50–60: They have spent 40 years performing duties without any real responsibility. They have bought a house, a second home, take at least one month of vacation every year, have paid for their children’s education (illiteracy 😂, but that’s another story), have had access to good healthcare, etc.
An Argentine municipal or government employee — or an employee of a private company — aged 50–60: They have spent 40 years performing duties without any real responsibility, but they have not been able to buy a house, let alone a second one. If they take a vacation, it is strictly in Argentina, because the moment they leave the country, the exchange rate destroys them.
We can criticize this system as much as we want, but this system has given us astonishing benefits, considering that we perform essentially the same jobs, while certainly working less.
And it has given the sheep far more than they deserve.
And this is the main reason why the system has not collapsed yet: the sheep defend it!!!!!
And it has given us astonishing benefits because it has managed to STEAL REAL RESOURCES from Argentina, Venezuela, Africa, China, Southeast Asia, etc., with the help of CORRUPT INSTITUTIONS — the politicians of those countries — which have allowed resources to flow out of those countries and thereby fuel massive globalization.
This, too, is a form of management, whether we like it or not.
When analyzing these things, I think we need to put our emotions aside and look at things for what they actually are.
And I have absolutely no certainty about what our lives would have looked like without the shepherds.
Because even among the sheep — including those who believe themselves to be sovereign — the moment someone says:
“Look, if we criticize the Zionists, you also have to give up the spoils, because those spoils are the RESULT OF THE DIFFERENCE EXPLAINED IN THE EMPLOYEE EXAMPLE, a difference created by the Zionists”...
...then we would probably get something like this in response:
“Ah, but I worked for that.”
And that answer implies that the person has not understood the system at all.
A system that, through finance — which is the soft version of brute force — through the multiplication of loaves and fishes, or through brute force itself, has multiplied our rights, transforming them into privileges, while dividing those of the Argentine employee.
And this is not submission to the shepherds.
It is simply acknowledging reality.
Acknowledging reality is THE ONLY WAY TO UNDERSTAND HOW TO, POSSIBLY, LAY THE FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW WORLD.
Those who think, or are certain, that without the shepherds we would have had a better life are acknowledging something that does not exist.
Because we are the people we were six years ago.
Collectively, this is what we are.
Neither more nor less.
I do not think we would know how to manage international trade.
I do not think we would know how to guarantee the mobility of millions of people.
I do not think we would have the ability to manage billions of people.
That is simply the reality we have to start from.