WE MUST NOT/SHOULD NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO DEMAND GOODS
By Mauro Marturano

Think about it. If the prices of houses, of Bitcoin, of stocks, of groceries go up, what does that mean?
It means that, with roughly the same salary, you can afford less.
Maybe you buy a house, but you buy a smaller one (fewer square meters).
Or maybe you cut back on vacations. Or maybe you cut back on groceries. Or maybe on everything, more likely.
After years of monetary blowouts (which GENERATED THE PERCEPTION OF ENTITLEMENTS in people), it's essential to make sure those entitlements can't be converted into goods. Because the goods AREN'T THERE.
This is the real illusion that fake-Draghi talked about in Rimini in September of '25. The reason it's necessary to make that illusion evaporate is that, if most people — who have lived treating money as the first and perhaps only goal of life — realized they had worked to accumulate something that, in practical terms, has no value (because it has no counterpart, because it has no underlying), all hell would break loose.
And since (and here I completely disagree with a lot of conspiracy theorists) I think they actually want to keep the shack standing, or bring it down at whatever pace they prefer, they've organized for us this endless series of situations whose absolutely common denominator is making the money previously earned, accumulated, etc., lose value.
Loss due to new issuance (which makes the pre-existing money supply lose value). Loss due to rising prices.
The whole thing is EMBARRASSINGLY simple, especially when I'm the one explaining it 😂
