A HUGE THIRD EUROPEAN QE IS COMING

By Mauro Marturano

In 2008 and in 2020, thanks to conveniently prepared events (Lehman Brothers and the great shame ๐Ÿ˜‚), the major central banks started issuing money or, as I often say, spewing money.

Using such a strong image is, as always ๐Ÿ˜‚, in everything ๐Ÿ˜‚ I write, absolutely deliberate, to make you understand the scale of the thing.

In both cases, the manipulative effect around the events was absolutely important. Strong excuses, media-wise strong excuses, that served to justify, after the fact, the necessity of those interventions.

"The situation required it."

Phrases that, if you think about it, we've also heard in other fields, like the health one ๐Ÿ˜‚.

It seems... it seems that you reach a certain point and there's nothing else you can do ๐Ÿ˜‚.

Also because, with the ignorance conveniently created in schools and universities and fed by garbage TV programs, critical thinking on certain topics isn't just underfoot, it's six feet under.

This is also our responsibility, where I see enlightened ๐Ÿ˜‚ good people trying to make others understand, with no self-interest, but who still get mocked, ridiculed by scarecrows running wild.

The first two great gushes of a lifetime happened 12 years apart (2008/2020).

If that's any indication, there will be a third one. And it will be in 2026 or, at the latest, 2027. At the latest.

As you can see, the time interval is much shorter: logical. Very logical.

More frequent gushes are needed to keep the whole racket standing.

This third one will have, in my opinion, fairly different characteristics from the first two.

While the first two were indiscriminate gushes โ€” where by "indiscriminate", in this case, I mean that all the central banks committed to it equally โ€” this time I expect some to stay still and some others to gush biblically.

Or, to put it better, that some will gush even on behalf of the other ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚.

Which, put like that, sounds great for the ones who gush for the others, but obviously, in this specific case, it doesn't quite work that way. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Specifically, I expect that, because of a nuclear event organized on European soil, we will have to gush also for the Americans, meaning, in effect, support their debt, their debt issuance.

Why?

Because of the energy they supply us, because of the grain they supply us, because of the weapons they supply us, etc.

This is the famous funnel onto American assets I told you about ๐Ÿ˜‚.

This is the second part of the movie I told you about in the piece "FROM TODAY ON YOU MUST TAKE PART IN THE COLLECTION FOR THE SEVENTH HAMBURGER" ๐Ÿ˜‚.

So it won't be an indiscriminate gush, but absolutely a "discriminating" one.

We will pay for the shameful war on Russia.

And we'll pay for it today (after the event), tomorrow and the day after tomorrow (where by "day after tomorrow" I mean in 20/30 years).

This is the scale of the mess that's been made.

Biblical messes that can only have biblical repercussions.

THERE ARE NO OTHER POSSIBILITIES.

A substantial reduction of the services we thought we could rely on for life ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ (this is the average mindset of the average person ๐Ÿ˜‚).

Healthcare, education and, above all, pensions destroyed.

The value of money destroyed.

The value of our currency destroyed.

Rightly so.

There will therefore be a net transfer of wealth that, at least in the short term, will benefit the average American citizen who, like us, is totally ignorant on the matter, but will find someone gushing on his behalf ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚.

America will stay standing as a result of this cannibalization of the most idiotic people, alongside the Japanese one ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚.

(I wonder what my ex-girlfriend Ako will think, finding her country, so far away, always popping up in the middle of my rants, surely without understanding a damn thing of what I write ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚).

Back to all articles