LET'S THINK

Let's try to understand who has an interest in bringing the whole thing down.

First of all, let's try to understand who, between debtor and creditor, has an interest in creating chaos (what is happening, in other words 😂). Let's start with an example.

Let's assume there is a dispute between a tenant who is behind on his rent and the landlord. The tenant, in order to justify not paying the rent, might invent problems with damp, come up with excuses, etc.

Who has an interest in creating chaos? The one who has debts? Or the one who has claims?

I would say logic dictates that the debtor has a much greater interest in stirring up trouble.

Now let's move on to the current situation 😁.

It seems obvious to me that Europe wants to create trouble. But, based on what we said before, the one who creates trouble is the one who has debts. But who does Europe owe these debts to? 😁😂

Other non-European countries? Yes, of course, that could also be the case. But are we really supposed to believe that Ursula is waging war against Russia to defend European citizens, and therefore creating chaos that would allow us to "have less debt than we would have without the chaos"? Quite a bizarre hypothesis.

So who does Europe actually owe its debt to?

Could it be that European citizens had been led to believe that they could have services and a quality of life that, in reality, could never actually have been provided to them? And that, somehow, rather clumsily, they are now being shown that... 🍌🍌🍌🍌😂

Could it be that, as has always been argued in the world's house 😂 of logic 😝, multiplication has created too many fictitious claims, and that today everything is, in reality, being brought back into alignment with reality?